July 2, 2022. Former Pfizer Exec Believes Leaky Vaccine Was Intentional: Dr. Michael Yeadon No operational false positive rates for PCR tests were reported.
2 May 2022. Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The Data Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid. The PCR "Covid-19 Confirmed Cases" are Meaningless. The Multibillion Dollar Antigen and Home Test Project is Fake
March 19, 2022. Biggest Lie in World History: The Data Base is Flawed. There Never Was A Pandemic. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid. By Prof Michel Chossudovsky. The PCR "Covid-19 Confirmed Cases" are Meaningless. The Multibillion Dollar Antigen and Home Test Project is Fake. The Central Role of the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR). From the very outset, both the media and the governments have overlooked and ignored the flaws and falsehoods pertaining to the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the spread of the virus and identifying SARS-CoV-2. ...Fake Data: 465 Million So-Called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” ... In early March 2022 an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) was established with a mandate to create “A Pandemic Treaty”, i.e. a global health governance entity under WHO auspices, which would override the authority of the WHO member states: “The INB held its first meeting to draft and negotiate an international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response under the authority of the WHO” (Mercola). The Pandemic Treaty is tied into the WHO’s QR Verification Code project, which is intent upon creating a global digital data bank of 7.9 billion people. Both initiatives are to be carried out concurrently by the WHO in liaison with ID2020 and the Gavi Alliance, both of which are funded by the Gates Foundation. ...Joe Biden’s Purchase of More than A Billion Home and Antigen Test Kits ...Justin Trudeau’s Purchase of 291 Million Home and Antigen Test Kits
2 March 2022. Shameless manipulation: Positive PCR tests drop after WHO instructs vendors to lower cycle thresholds. We have been played like a fiddle. I wrote this on February 12, 2021, but it is chock full of facts that are needed to understand how COVID cases, deaths, tests were calibrated for maximal political effect...these facts remain unknown
February 17, 2022. CDC Admits Covid Nose Swabs Ended Up in a Lab for Genomic Sequencing Analysis
February 08, 2022 State Halts Use of Flawed U.S.-Funded Korean COVID Test; Half Return False Negative
[KD: Of course the right way to test for COVID is temperature checks and a pulse oximeter; or simply treat anyone who is high risk as soon as symptoms appear.]
01/28/22 How U.S. COVID Testing Strategy Will Extend Pandemic Nightmare -- President Biden’s massive increase in home-based rapid antigen tests will lead to a tsunami of false-positive results, which will indefinitely extend the current “casedemic.”
2 Jan 2022. New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading: but everybody’s doing it, so who cares, right?
4 Jan 2022. CDC's Dr. Rochelle Walensky told us in one statement that the PCR test is pure garbage, they KNEW it is over-cycled & creates FALSE POSITIVES; e.g Dr. REDFIELD told me in person, 6 ft had '0' science; made up. 97% of positive tests the last 2 years were false; This one sentence should tell us that COVID is over, OMICRON killed it DOA, its on life support now, and Rochelle let the cat out of the bag
The REAL way to test people for COVID illness: “Elderly people have frail immune systems, and Dr. George Fareed in Southern California recognized early on that you can’t just give hydroxychloroquine and zinc and vitamin D and antibiotics day four or five, which works for middle-aged people perfectly well, doesn’t work for frail elderly because the virus has had no immune system growing to try to suppress it because of their age and disabilities. In them, you have to give it on day one. How do you give it on day one? It means you have to screen them daily. You screen them for a fever and pulse oximeters…test blood oxygen levels—doing that twice a day. When their oxygens were dropping, but they weren’t otherwise symptomatic, and you found a fever that you wouldn’t have recognized, you start treating them,... ” Dec 3, 2021
CDC Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus. December 29, 2021.
CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.
This explains the disappearance of Flu cases in the US in 2020. It also inflated the COVID cases as Dr. Fauci and the DC elites knew would happen.
December 27, 2021 CDC Admits that the Covid Pandemic Was the Product of an Inappropriate Test. The CDC admits that the PCR test cannot differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. ... I reported several months ago that the “health authorities” had reached this decision but were withholding its implementation until the end of 2021. They needed the fake test to keep the fear going in order to achieve as much vaccination, and therefore as much profit, as possible.
The FDA has requested removal of the PCR test for EUA on Dec 31, 2021 because it is unreliable and can’t differentiate between Influenza and COVID or other substances and admitted in a memo from 12/14 that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests for Sars-Cov-2 result in false positives. Future tests will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, running 25-30 cycles instead of more than 35. This in turn, will result in the number of “positive Covid cases” plummeting, making it appear, at first, as if vaccines work.
Dangerous Ethylene Oxide in Nasal Swabs. All About the Nasal Swab. Jun 20 (3) All about the Nasal Swab. - RN - YouTube
KARY MULLIS: WHAT HE SAID ABOUT THE PCR TEST ~ COVID1984 Dr Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize laureate who invented the PCR process, has been adamant that the test was never meant as a diagnostic tool. “When it comes to Covid, the presence of viral particles picked up by the PCR technique does not and has not been quantitatively linked to an active ‘symptomatic’ infection. It simply cannot be so, because infection threshold as a result of viral load is different for each patient.” It turns out, if you ‘cycle’ over around 25 times, the false positivity of Covid infection starts getting very high.”
FDA recalling 2 million Ellume at-home COVID-19 test kits because of false positives. November 11, 2021
Nov 2, 2021. A Routine Sanger Sequencing Target Specific Mutation Assay For SARS-CoV-2 Variants Of Concern And Interest
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak From COVID-19 Swab. Yusuf Mosen Agamawi, MD, Arya Namin, MD, and Yadranko Ducic, MD. Oct - Dec, 2021. Ten cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak from COVID-19 swabs. ... patients with CSF leak may experience headaches and even go on to develop the severe CSF leak complication of meningitis, as first reported by Alberola-Amores et al. 5
Covid “rapid tests” found to contain cancer causing chemical ethylene oxide, used for medical sterilization. October 31, 2021.
October 11, 2021. Why is the COVID Case Count So High? In this essay Ted Noel MD, anesthesiologist/intensivist, explains why case counts are deceptive and exaggerated, why the PCR test is an unreliable marker and how immunity is achieved.
Sep 9, 2021. Cribriform Plate Injury After Nasal Swab Testing for COVID-19 PCR nasal swab may damage to the cribriform plate, which is a very delicate structure at junction of the nasopharynx/cranial cavity in close proximity to the meninges and thus the brain and CSF. As the swab is inserted deep into the nasopharynx the cribriform plate is in jeopardy of injury during testing. Breach of the plate can cause CSF leak or worse - bacterial meningitis, etc.
A strategy for defeating the COVID narrative. September 3, 2021
August 23, 2021: video: Fr. John Rizzo with Dr Delores Cahill, Professor of Immunology, and Dr. Peter McCullough, COVID-19 Crisis and Why Injections Should Stop. Cahill, President of the World's Doctors Alliance: Lengthy discussion of the fraudulent nature of the PCR tests and the ability to now require sequencing of the tests and bring lawsuits against false positives as the basis for forced sequestration or lockdowns and isolation in hospitals. No US labs have shown their PCR tests can differentiate between COVID and Influenza. The CDC implemented a recall of PCR testing within 24 hours after the right was won to sequence PCR tests to determine the accuracy of PCR test positives. Huge harm and suffering has been caused by these vaccines. McCullough: The vaccines are failing. Months after the vaccinations patients are developing neurological problems including paralysis, seizures, blindness, problems swallowing. We will see more and more morbidity and mortality.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson: "It's all been a pack of lies". Canadian Dr. Roger Hodkinson BLASTS this "unprecedented horror show," and the disgusting politicians, journalistic hacks and venal quacks who put it over. August 19, 2021
JFK21 won a court case in Denmark. PCR-test NOT required! August 10, 2021.
Has the CDC admitted there is a problem with the PCR? Covid-19: Dr Sam FAQs 2. August 10, 2021.
Why Is The CDC Quietly Abandoning The PCR Test For COVID? Jul 26, 2021. Killing off the PCR Test would go a long way to "solving" the "casedemic" and offer Biden and his pals a positive talking point for voters.
The pandemic scare was based on daily reported cases of infection detected with the PCR Test. In July, the CDC has issued a “Laboratory Alert”: https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html to phase out PCR tests for Covid-19 by 31 December 2021: After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. (Emphasis added.) The CDC has quietly admitted that the PCR test cannot distinguish between Covid-19 and the flu! A new method of assay is recommended: CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. ... (Emphasis added.) Biologically, the Covid virus has a ling single strand RNA, whereas the flu viruses have segmented RNA. Both have spike proteins on their surfaces. Both have large numbers of overlapping symptoms of infection, with the main difference being the types of disease manifestation in the respiratory system. Covid induces a stronger auto-immune response perhaps to do more damage
CHD has created these downloadable letters for people facing mandates: notice for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines; notice for EUA testing; and notice for EUA masks.
CDC, FDA Faked ‘Covid’ Testing Protocol by Using Human Cells Mixed With Common Cold Virus Fragments. July 30, 2021
07/21/2021: CDC: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing. CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.
June 25, 2021 WHO has statements AGAINST asymptomatic testing in most circumstances except senior facility workers and some contact situations. Please message this hard as we need to stamp out useless --producing mostly false positives-- testing in facilities, travel, businesses, and sports.
- Testing of asymptomatic individuals with NAAT or Ag-RDTs is currently recommended only for specific groups including contacts of confirmed or probable COVID-19 cases and frequently exposed groups such as health care workers and long-term care facility workers.
- Widespread screening of asymptomatic individuals is not a currently recommended strategy due to the significant costs associated with it and the lack of data on its operational effectiveness.
Lisbon Court Rules Only 0.9% of ‘Verified Cases’ Died of COVID, Numbering 152, Not 17,000 Claimed. Global Research, June 28, 2021. America's Frontline Doctors 23 June 2021
Stop Using Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test: FDA Safety Communication Date Issued: June 10, 2021
PCR Test Class 1 Recall [Most serious type of recall]: FDA Says Innova PCR Tests Are Dangerous & Inaccurate (Massively Used)
FDA: Stop using Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test LABline Jun 14th, 2021
'Place them in the trash': FDA warns against using Innova's rapid COVID-19 antigen tests by Conor Hale |Jun 11, 2021 11:29am
PCR Test Class 1 Recall FDA Says Innova PCR Tests Are Dangerous & Inaccurate (Massively Used) Mary Tanasy. 17 Jun 2021
The Innova scandal Part 3: The US says ‘Throw the tests in the trash’ By Sonia Elijah June 14, 2021 "It is also the test that made one brand new California-based company the largest single financial beneficiary of UK Covid contracts, for which the Government has committed £3.2billion to date."
CDC Caught Cooking the Books on COVID Vaccines. Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked. June 11, 2021.
- Now, as over 100 million Americans have been “vaccinated” against COVID-19, the CDC is lowering the CT from 40 to 28, but only when diagnosing vaccine breakthrough cases — cases where fully vaccinated individuals are diagnosed with COVID-19
- To make matters worse, the CDC also will no longer record mild or asymptomatic infections of those who were immunized as “COVID cases.” The only cases that now count as COVID cases for someone immunized with the COVID-19 vaccine are those that result in hospitalization or death
“Rapid Covid tester investigated for insurance fraud scheme” – Public prosecutors in Germany have opened an investigation into a testing company that reported far more tests than it actually performed, according to Deutsche Welle May 30, 2021.
05/26/21 Number of Kids Hospitalized for COVID Inflated by at Least 40%, New Research Suggests Two papers published in the journal of Hospital Pediatrics found pediatric hospitalizations for COVID were overcounted by at least 40%, carrying potential implications for nationwide figures used to justify vaccinating children.
Two papers published in the journal of Hospital Pediatrics found pediatric hospitalizations for COVID were overcounted by at least 40%, carrying potential implications for nationwide figures used to justify vaccinating children.
Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd. May 21, 2021
What is a PCR Test? February 2021 Sources Cited
The November 2020 Research Gate post, "External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results."
The July 2020 Science Direct post from the Journal of Clinical Virology under the title, "Real-time PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 detection in Canadian laboratories - ScienceDirect."
The January 19th, 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) post, "WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2021/01: All in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs) for detection of SARS-CoV-2."
The July 1st, 2020 Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) post, "COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless."
Fraud: PCR Ct test cycles set too high, creating mostly false positives
FDA link below. In the link below, go to section "PCR Amplification"
Steps 1 through Step 4
Step 1 1 cycle
Step 2 ! cycle
Step 3 5 cycles
Step 4 40 Cycles
Total Cycles 47
UK National Health Services Link. Page 21. 45 cycles
WHO guidelines Ct=47
PCR testing cycles at 22 labs across Canada average amplification cycles are 37
Dr.Heneghan Oxford Professor Editor of British Medical Journal BMJ
“A cut-off RT-PCR Ct > 30 is associated with non-infectious samples.”
“The lowest viral load (Ct value) for which there was positive culture growth was 34.3.”
No live viruses are found at CT values of 30 or 34 and above.
All what these tests are detecting is old debris of the virus.
SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection
Sweden Drops PCR Tests: RNA From Viruses Can Be Detected For Months After Infection. May 20, 2021.
How the CDC is manipulating data to prop-up “vaccine effectiveness” New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated. May 18, 2021.
COVID Fraud – Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’. May 15, 2021. ... Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.
Wormlike Worms/Fibers/Micelles in Face Masks & PCR Test Swabs - Are they for drug delivery?
05/10/21 ‘Highway Robbery’ — $1,419 for a COVID Test?
CDC wants more data on breakthrough cases. Notice they are looking for positives with a cycle threshold less than 28. Suddenly the CDC's rules have changed about what a "case" really is... At least they are going to collect data. CDC, changes PCR test CT cycles and criteria for definition as a COVID case (to reduce the number of "breakthrough cases" reported in those who received the experimental COVID jab?) " Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28."
A Statistics Lesson: Understanding False Positives and Fear. The Chloroquine Wars Part XVIII. April 30, 2021.
Pepsi Max Tests Positive for COVID-19. Pepsi Max (other vegetable extract-based drinks are available) – positive for SARS-CoV-2! Then milk – a very faint line, but still classed as a positive according my official NHS leaflet. And finally, mango chutney, the third positive COVID-19 test result. April 21, 2021.
Austrian Court Rules PCR Unsuited For COVID, Lockdowns Unlawful. April 27, 2021 - 2:52pm PCR test unsuitable for Covid. Lockdown unlawful Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
Asymptomatic spread of the SARS-COV-2 virus has not been shown to occur, so why are asymptomatic persons being tested?
An Austrian court that says that PCR tests are not suitable for determining infectivity... the court also criticized the health policy data. The judges determined that the corona measures have so far been without any evidence as to their effectiveness. The link is in German, though. The judge's verdict rejects the entire corona policy in Austria, which is based on the PCR test.
Not Everybody Should Take the PCR Test. There is no reason for persons with no COVID symptoms to take a PCR test because no studies have shown there is spread of infection from people without symptoms.
The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis. By Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Global Research, March 26, 2021
Lateral Flow Tests Too Inaccurate for Mass Testing, Major Review Finds March 2021. By Will Jones. "A Cochrane review of 64 studies found that asymptomatic testing only picked up around 50% of cases, and picked up far more false than real positives when infection rates were low in the community.... False results from lateral flow Covid tests may mean workplaces and schools will be needlessly forced to close even though the scheme was set up to keep them open, experts cautioned.... The group concluded that mass testing policies had been implemented “without any supporting real-world evidence”.
The risks parents aren’t being told about the COVID tests children are taking in schools. Sadly, such is the myopia over COVID-19, there seems to be little concern or sympathy for the plight of our children or the concerns of parents. Mar 25, 2021. ... Concerns are now being expressed over the use of a known carcinogen, ethylene oxide (EtO), to sterilise the swabs used for COVID tests. Ethylene oxide is a commonly used sterilisation agent used in the production of medical devices such as swabs. ... cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks may be caused if the cribriform plate membranes between nasal passageways and brain are punctured.
Kids, Schools and COVID Tests — What Are the Risks? March 2021. by Alliance for Natural Health International Researchers warn of brain injury risks for millions of children who are now going to routinely undergo nasal swab tests administered by nonexperts... the improper use of nasal swabs used in PCR or lateral flow testing may result in damage to the delicate membrane protecting the brain. But if you were to believe the fact-checkers, you’d assume this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory. But as has been demonstrated in many other instances, the fact checkers have got it wrong again. There is a risk — and that risk gets greater as more and more untrained people (now including children) administer their own swabs. In October 2020, a case report was published in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery detailing the case of a woman whose brain membrane was pierced by a COVID test swab resulting in the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. A second woman in the U.S. recently had a similar experience. Assessing the use of nasal swabs, researchers publishing in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery issued warnings about the risks for the millions who are now routinely going to undergo tests, especially from inexpertly administered nasal swabs... the cribriform plate, the significant part that separates the brain from the nasal cavity is a delicate, soft, honey-comb or sieve-like structure that is thin and narrow with tiny perforations. ...Why lateral flow testing in schools is deeply misleading — and a waste of public money
Right to Refuse an Experimental PCR Test
Asymptomatic transmission of covid-19 December 2020. The only test for live virus is viral culture. PCR and lateral flow tests do not distinguish live virus. No test of infection or infectiousness is currently available for routine use.678 As things stand, a person who tests positive with any kind of test may or may not have an active infection with live virus, and may or may not be infectious.9
- A rapid review and meta-analysis of the asymptomatic proportion of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in community settings.Wellcome Open Research. 05 Nov 2020doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16387.1
- SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe2020doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30172-5
- Operation Moonshot proposals are scientifically unsound. BMJ2020;370:m3699. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3699 pmid:32963111
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 interim case definition. 5 Aug 2020. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/08/05/
Seven in 10 positive Covid cases in school children likely to be wrong. Thousands of pupils and their families are having to isolate needlessly, and missing more days after months away from classrooms. By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor March 2021
Texas woman leaked spinal fluid after COVID-19 nasal swab test March 2021. Chari Timm will need surgery to repair the rupture in a membrane that protects the central nervous system.
Why the school testing regime needs to change
The PCR Test Fraud and COVID-19 will be the Legal Case of the Century. Dr Reiner Fuellmich begins Legal Litigation on the Covid-19 Fraud- The Greatest Crime Against Humanity Evolve to Ecology February 27, 2021. Dr Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who has managed to convict the car giant Volkswagen for the modified catalytic converters. This same attorney successfully convicted Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise, the bank agreed to pay more than $ 130 million in damages, as a consequence.
Video: Attorney Dr Reiner Füllmich and Dr Astrid Stückelberger discuss it may be illegal to claim the PCR test can detect SARS-COV-2 infections
The covi-19 pandemic and legal questions against its orchestrators. Gary Null Radio Interview. March 2021. You could skip the first part about nutrition by scrolling to about 9 minutes. Speaks about PCR tests, Dr. Fauci's history of similarly damaging censorship of effective treatments during the AIDs epidemic, etc. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German-American attorney and the founding chairman of the Investigative Corona Committee that is proceeding with class action lawsuits against some of the architects of the coronavirus panic. In the past Dr. Fuellmich was a faculty member o the Georg August University in Gottingen where he received his doctorate, and worked in the legal aspects of corporate banking at Deutsche Bank in Germany and Japan. He also has a background in medical law and in the 1980s was a research assistant at the Research Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Law. For many years he has been practicing and has published papers on patient rights adn civil responsibility in the pharmaceutical industry.
These U.S. and International Airports Have COVID-19 Testing Facilities By Michelle Baran December 2020
PCR test page: Coronavirus Fact-Check #10: Why “new cases” are plummeting. February, 2021. The number of “new cases” reported is tumbling in many countries around the world, and has been for over a month. So what’s causing it? ..."on January 13th the WHO published a memo regarding the problem of asymptomatic cases being discovered by PCR tests, and suggesting any asymptomatic positive tests be repeated. This followed up their previous memo, instructing labs around the world to use lower cycle thresholds (CT values) for PCR tests, as values over 35 could produce false positives."
Covid-19: Behind the PCR Curtain Feb 9, 2021.
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over" Jan 10, 2021
Interpreting a covid-19 test result BMJ 2020; 369 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1808 (Published 12 May 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;369:m1808
CDC Report: Officials Knew Coronavirus Test Was Flawed But Released It Anyway. November 2020
Covid-19 positive test cycle threshold trends predict covid-19 mortality in Rhode Island Andrew G. Bostom, M.D.,M.S.,1 Todd Kenyon, Ph.D.,2 Charles B. Eaton, M.D., M.S.1medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250557 January 29, 2021.
The cycle thresholds (Cts) at which reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) tests for covid-19 become positive are intimately associated with both viral load, and covid-19 infectiousness (i.e. ability to culture live virus). Clinical data indicate lower Cts, and hence larger viral loads, independently predict greater covid-19 mortality when patients are hospitalized for symptomatic covid-19 pneumonia.
The COVID-19 PCR Test Is Key to the Pandemic Fraud September 8, 2020
Rapid COVID-19 test effort stumbles over risk of false positives
John Tozzi, Angelica LaVito and Emma Court Bloomberg News
A Critical Review of CDC USA Data on Covid-19: PCR/Antigen Tests & Cases Reveal Herd Immunity Only, and Do Not Warrant Public Hysteria or Lockdowns
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348550612 James DeMeo 2021
False-Positives are Crushing the NHS by George Michael
A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
By Great Game India Global Research, November, 2020
Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates
Rita Jaafar, Sarah Aherfi, Nathalie Wurtz, Clio Grimaldier, Thuan Van Hoang, Philippe Colson, Didier Raoult, Bernard La Scola September 2020 Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciaa1491, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491
Dr Rodger Hodkinson [Medical specialist in pathology incl. Virology…] on Covid Hoax. 5 minutes. November 2020. “…unfounded public hysteria driven by the media. There is nothing that can be done to contain this virus, just like a bad flu season. There is no action needed. Masks are utterly useless. There is no knowledge base supporting their use. Social distancing is useless. Everywhere should be open tomorrow as in the Great Barrington declaration. Re. testing: Positive test results do Not mean a clinical infection. All testing should stop unless you are presenting to hospital. Give all nursing home residents 3K to 5K IUs of Vitamin D every day."
The testing mess, lack of reliable data on Covid-19, and a hypothesis why By Meryl Nass October 2020
Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020
This extensive review report has been officially submitted to Eurosurveillance editorial board on 27th November 2020 via their submission-portal, enclosed to this review report is a retraction request letter, signed by all the main & co-authors. First and last listed names are the first and second main authors. All names in between are co-authors.
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. November, 2020
WHO Now Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives — Is There a Hidden Agenda? December, 2020. Yet the CDC still recommends running PCR tests at a CT of 40 — even though anything over 35 should be deemed scientifically unjustifiable.
Once everyone has received the vaccination, per the new WHO guidelines, PCR tests will run only 25 to 30 cycles instead of more than 35. The cases of false positives will significantly drop, giving the illusion that the vaccine is working.
PCR Test for Coronavirus Questioned by Prominent Scientists
by Barbara Cáceres. December 16, 2020
Florida COVID-19 Policy Leads the Nation Once Again, This Time on Testing By Stacey Lennox Dec 07, 2020
For The First Time, A US State Will Require Disclosure Of PCR 'Cycle Threshold' Data In COVID Tests by Tyler Durden. Monday, December 2020
Evidence emerges that COVID tests are faulty. FDA and CDC admit as much Lockdowns around the world are based on rising numbers of positive test results, many of which are likely to be incorrect. December 2020
WHO Updates Guidance on PCR Tests 20 January 2021. Recommends Re-Testing to Confirm Positives. Says “as disease prevalence decreases, risk of false positives increases…Provide the Ct value in the report to health care provider.”
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology…
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Letter to the President of the Academy of Sciences and Literature in Mainz Prof. Dr. Reiner Anderl, Declaring His Resignation from the Academy of Sciences. February 14, 2021
Against the Misuse of Science in the So-called “Pandemic”. The RT-PCR Test By Prof. Dr. Thomas Aigner February 14, 2021
A Critical Review of CDC USA Data on Covid-19: PCR/Antigen Tests and Cases Reveal Herd Immunity Only and Do Not Warrant Public Hysteria or Lockdowns James DeMeo 2021
Shameless manipulation: Positive PCR tests drop after WHO instructs vendors to lower cycle thresholds. We have been played like a fiddle February, 2021
Dr. Richard Urso, MD, Summit, Summit II
Talking about PCR False Positives (A “case-demic” not a pandemic) Shows quotes of Dr. Fauci re. asymptomatic spread. Human chromosome 8 can register as a false positive. Contact tracing asymptomatic people makes no sense. Asymptomatic people are not spreading disease. They’re spreading immunity. It’s okay for kids to go back to school. Better case fatality rates than the flu for people under 70. We don’t have a pandemic anymore. The pandemic is over. The PCR test is driving this “case-demic”.
Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Dr. Mike Yeadon - former vice president for Pfizer about PCR Tests Dr. Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology and has 30 years experience in new medicines research in major pharmaceutical companies, including as Pfizer VP & chief scientist for allergy and respiratory. “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they’ve been fooled” Mark Twain. “There are lots of “cases” aka false positives and people are dying, but the two things are not related any more.” Wrote the Article: “What Sage has got wrong” Listen to video at 7 minutes in!
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already. [In both English and German]
COVID tests may inflate numbers by picking up dead virus. Nov 9, 2020.
High PCR test sensitivity inflates COVID-19 cases and wrongly conflates the issue of contagiousness with the presence of infection. Nov 8, 2020.
The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society "This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients." …The PCR technique was developed by chemist Kary B. Mullis in 1986. Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993…Kary Mullis himself stated that if PCR was a good tool for research, it was a very bad tool in medicine, in the clinic .
….Positive RT-PCR tests, without any mention of Ct or its relation to the presence or absence of symptoms, are used as is by our governments as the exclusive argument to apply and justify their policy of severity, austerity, isolation and aggression of our freedoms, with the impossibility to travel, to meet, to live normally! There is no medical justification for these decisions, for these governmental choices! In an article published on the website of the New York Times (NYT) on Saturday, August 29, American experts from Harvard University are surprised that RT-PCR tests as practiced can serve as tests of contagiousness, even more so as evidence of pandemic progression in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection .
Why Are Covid-19 Cases Soaring In NZ? PCR Test Update By Dr. Sam Bailey
The Tests: The Achilles Heel of the COVID-19 House of Cards By Dr. Pascal Sacré. Global Research, June 06, 2020. Looking for more truth and getting closer to the truth is the best antidote to fear.
– Tests which are not reliable!
– False negatives (real patients not detected).
– False positives (patients who are not positive)
– Tests that detect fragments of the virus and not the virus itself!
– Tests that don’t quantify the viral load, the most important thing…
– Test kits infected with the virus itself: you could catch it by getting tested!
Crimes Against Humanity, fraudulent PCR Tests Taken To Court - Interview with Lawyer Reiner Füllmich Nov 11, 2020
What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has No Scientific Basis By Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Global Research, October 08, 2020. Closing down the Global Economy as a means to combating the Virus. That's what they want us to believe. If the public had been informed that Covid-19 is “similar to Influenza”, the fear campaign would have fallen flat...
Dr. Fauci Told the Truth About COVID-19 Tests in July and Has Been Misleading the Public Ever Since By Stacey Lennox, November 11 2020. The New York Times and several experts admitted in late August that up to 90% of positive PCR tests were not indicative of the active illness that could be transmitted to others. As it turns out, Fauci expressed a similar opinion in July.
The Covid-19 Numbers Game: The “Second Wave” is Based on Fake Statistics By Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Global Research, November 01, 2020
Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts Nov 2020. by Jon Rappoport
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US
Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR technology that is being widely used to test for so-called ‘cases’ of COVID-19, did not believe the technology was suitable for detecting a meaningful presence of a virus…. “I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” … If they are amplified less than about 35 times, no-one will test positive. If they are amplified 60 times, everyone will test positive. The flawed thinking is obvious enough.
"FDA warns about false positive results from COVID-19 (rapid) antigen tests." Reuters reported that after false positive tests in nursing homes, FDA wanted to remind us that we can't trust these tests.
Cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR A guide for health protection teams about interpreting Ct in real-time, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays performed for Sars-CoV-2. Notice in the image below: Positive results with low viral load (high Ct) can be seen in the early stages of infection (before the person becomes capable of transmission of the infection) or late in infection when the risk of transmission is low (periods indicated by the dotted red line).
What does PCR mean?
Rapid COVID-19 test effort stumbles over risk of false positives
John Tozzi, Angelica LaVito and Emma Court Bloomberg News October 10, 2020
.... Nevada this month ordered nursing homes to stop using the point-of-care tests after they found more than 20 instances where positive findings were overturned by more precise assays. That was more than half of the positive samples re-tested. Other states are now questioning their accuracy as well.
Federal officials, meanwhile, said states don’t have the authority to bar the tests, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it would take “appropriate action” if Nevada didn’t cease the ban....
In recent weeks, a new concern has emerged around false positives, which could prompt nursing homes to isolate residents or even dangerously move them to COVID-19 wards when they’re not infected.
“Then they go and get COVID,” said Jeff Engel, senior adviser at the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, or CSTE. “We think there’s a lot more work that needs to be done on accuracy” of point-of-care tests.
CSTE has heard about false positives in almost every state, though Nevada is the only state known to have recommended halting the tests, Dr. Engel said.
Manufacturers of the screenings, government officials and an independent expert, say that false positives occur with all tests and that the concerns are based on a small sample.
Of 3,725 antigen tests performed at Nevada nursing homes, 39 positive antigen test samples were also sent for PCR testing. According to the Nevada directive this month, 16 of those were true positives and 23 were false positives. [KD: that's an almost 60% false positive rate but based on PCR tests that may also include false positives! It may be time to return to medical doctor diagnosis.]
Rapid COVID-19 Testing Questioned for False Positives
Kansas labs set cycle thresholds too high, detect non-contagious virus
[KD: All PCR test labs have a conflict of interest (just like our news media being funded by big Pharma trying to sell us potentially harmful & ineffective drugs & vaccines ) in that the testing labs continue to get funding if they continue to find positive (albeit mostly false) SARS-Cov-2 test results that the press wrongly calls "cases", even though the virus itself has already ripped through and infected most of the population that could be infected. This Kansas lab is not the only PCR testing lab setting too-high # test cycles.]
“Michael Mina, an assistant professor of epidemiology at both Harvard Medical School and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health told Harvard Magazine that reporting someone positive on a test with a high cycle threshold is like finding a hair in a room, testing it for DNA, and then saying the person who shed that hair is currently in the room.
“That’s a false positive, but that’s what we’re doing,” he said.”
Does anyone know if doctors have proposed acceptable alternatives such as saliva tests or swab tests at the back of the mouth away from the cribiform plate?
Covid Test Nasal Swab Punctured Woman’s Brain Lining And Caused Brain Fluid To Leak From Her Nose October 2, 2020
PCR Swab Tests Fractured Cribiform Plate
I will also add that Patients with Alzheimer's also have this fluid leaking from there nasal cavity. “A fractured cribriform plate can result in olfactory dysfunction, septal hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea (CSF rhinorrhoea), and possibly infection which can lead to meningitis. CSF rhinorrhoea (clear fluid leaking from the nose) is very serious and considered a medical emergency. Aging can cause the openings in the cribriform plate to close, pinching olfactory nerve fibers. A reduction in olfactory receptors, loss of blood flow, and thick nasal mucus can also cause an impaired sense of smell.
PCR tests are highly prone to false positives ( with a 45- 80% rate of false positives ). Clearly, this swabbing method is both unnecessary, and extremely dangerous.
Not to mention all of the contaminated swab tests that have had to be recalled. Contaminated with WHAT exactly?
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity — A Strategy for Containment
Michael J. Mina, M.D., Ph.D., Roy Parker, Ph.D., and Daniel B. Larremore, Ph.D.
... in Massachusetts and New York, more than 50% of infections identified by PCR-based surveillance had PCR cycle threshold values in the mid-to-upper 30s, indicating low viral RNA counts. Although such low counts could imply either an early- or a late-stage infection, the long duration of the RNA-positive tail suggests that most infected people are being identified after the infectious period has passed. Crucially for the economy, it also means that thousands of people are being sent to 10-day quarantines after positive RNA tests despite having already passed the transmissible stage of infection.
The testing mess, lack of reliable data on Covid-19, and a hypothesis why By Meryl Nass. October, 2020
The Folly of "New Cases": War, Deception, and the Crux of COVID-19 Thursday, February 27, 2020
Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford Test and tracing is a mistake: only creates panic
What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has No Scientific Basis. Closing down the Global Economy as a means to combating the Virus. That's what they want us to believe. If the public had been informed that Covid-19 is “similar to Influenza”, the fear campaign would have fallen flat... By Prof Michel Chossudovsky September, 2020
Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted by Barbara Cáceres. September, 2020
CR positives: what do they mean? September, 2020 Updated 23 September 2020 Tom Jefferson, Carl Heneghan
Worthless Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing
How many Covid diagnoses are false positives? July 2020
Lies Damned Lies and Health Statistics…
"The Mathematics of Testing" Written by Graeme McMillan
New York Times has confirmed that the false positive test rate in Massachusetts is now between 80% to 90%.
Pitfalls of repeat testing, illustrated with the House of Commons September 9, 2020. Richard Stevens, Annette Plüddemann, Jason Oke
Failing the Coronavirus-Testing Test by Jonathan Shaw 8.3.20
Experts Say COVID-19 Positivity Rate High Due to Too-sensitive Tests
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectivity assessment – a systematic review Jefferson T1; Spencer EA1; Brassey J2; Heneghan C1. Objective to review the evidence from studies comparing SARS-CoV-2 culture, the best indicator of current infection and infectiousness with the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Conclusion: Infectivity is related to the date of onset of symptoms and cycle threshold level... A binary Yes/No approach to the interpretation RT-PCR unvalidated against viral culture will result in false positives with possible segregation of large numbers of people who are no longer infectious and hence not a threat to public health.
Every country should be launching the sequencing of the PCR tests. James Corbett’s conversation with Dolores Cahill, PhD. ... Wants to sequence PCR tests, which are currently testing positive for influenza viruses. Can initiate suits for quarantining and false diagnoses. Spending taxpayers’ money on tests that are *not* detecting SARS-COV-2 and are committing fraud by using these tests. Could sue the manufacturer of the test, the persons requiring the tests, the hospital, the doctors or their insurance,…. If SARS-COV-2 is not being detected in these tests.
ALL travellers to New York must now be tested. October 2020. New Jersey also required visitors from almost every state in the US to quarantine when they visit - all based on experimental PCR positive tests, the vast majority that were most likely false positives.
The following is taken from the Sep 22, 2021 article: 30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet You asked for it, so we made it. A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need. by Kit Knightly
Part III: PCR Tests
11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness. The Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the “gold standard” for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:
PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable. The “gold standard” PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of false-positive results, by reacting to DNA material that is not specific to Sars-Cov-2.
A Chinese study found the same patient could get two different results from the same test on the same day. In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to common cold viruses. A 2006 study found PCR tests for one virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an “outbreak” of Whooping Cough that never actually existed. Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative control sample.
The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for the virus.
As early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese state television “The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%”. The Australian government’s own website claimed “There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.” And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were “unreliable” and should not be used for diagnosis.
You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, here and here.
13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles you use to get your result is known as your “cycle threshold” or CT value. Kary Mullis said: “If you have to go more than 40 cycles[…]there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”
The MIQE PCR guidelines agree, stating: “[CT] values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,” Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35 cycles is almost never culturable.
Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times: Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive…I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.
In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point out that reducing the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced “covid cases” in some states by as much as 90%.
The CDC’s own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Germany’s Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is likely to be infectious.
Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS “standard operating procedure” for PCR tests rules set the limit at 40 cycles.
Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR test results are at best questionable.
14. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives. In December 2020 WHO put out a briefing memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing false positive results:
when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be re-tested because they might be false positives:
Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is questionable. The genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019, then published on January 10th 2020. Less than two weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.
They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020, and then accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper was allegedly “peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.
Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper’s methodology.
They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply.
The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.
RESISTANCE TO EXPERIMENTAL PCR TESTING
Lawsuit filed in New Mexico and OHIO on the PCR Test fraud
Canadian Refuses Swab Test at Border
Parents sue Park City School District, Summit County health officials over COVID-19 testing program. Park Record. March 11, 2021. They claim implementation of ‘Test to Stay’ is a violation of their constitutional rights
- Parents sue over mandatory COVID testing in Park City, Utah schools ABC News. Mar 12, 2021.
- Parents sue Park City School District over COVID-19 tests required to go to school in person. Fox News.
- Parents sue Park City School District over COVID-19 tests required to go to school in person. SL Tribune. The schools required testing every 14 days, the suit says — a standard usually used for sports and extracurriculars.
- 1912 views